People v. Martin
Michigan Supreme Court
Exceptions before judgment from superior court of Grand Rapids; Burlingame, J. Isma Martin was convicted of larceny.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
The respondent was convicted in the superior court of Grand Rapids of the offense of larceny of *447property belonging to Gertrude Anderson. There are many assignments of error, but the important question in the case is whether the facts shown by the testimony constitute the offense of larceny. The respondent offered no testimony. The jury, in order to convict, must have believed the testimony offered by the people, which was to the following effect: In the early part of 1897 the respondent came to Grand Rapids as a solicitor for a life-insurance company of which S. P. Angus was the Detroit…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Loomis v. . PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Commonwealth v. BarryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
- People v. ShawMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
- Welsh v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1856
- Zink v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Graham v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
- Williams v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
- Means v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1933
- Bergeron v. PeytonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
- United States v. One 1941 Chrysler Brougham SedanDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1947
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.