McMinn v. O'Connor
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court, Twelfth Judicial District, City and County of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court, Currey, J.
Ejectment for one hundred vara lot Number Three Hundred and Nine, in the City of San Francisco. Both parties claim the property as derived from one Mathew Maume, the common source of title. The plaintiff claims under a deed from Maume to one Michael Dundon, dated January 15, 1859, and a deed from Dundon to himself, dated May 10, 1861. The defendants claim through a Sheriff’s deed bearing date the 11th of June, 1861, made in pursuance of a sale under an execution issued upon a judgment in favor of one Timothy Gleason against said Maume, rendered on the 27th of October,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Van Maren v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Landers v. BoltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
3Cited by14 opinions
- Bagley v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Page v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Pollard v. HarlowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Reily v. LancasterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- Moss v. ShearCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.