Legal Opinion
Cordis Corp. v. Boston Scientific Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided May 28, 2004No. 04-1098PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RADER, Circuit Judge.
The United States District Court for the District of Delaware denied Cordis Corp.’s (Cordis’s) motion for a preliminary injunc*931tion that would have enjoined sales of Boston Scientific Corp.’s (BSC’s) drug-eluting stent. Cordis Corp. v. Boston Sci. Corp., Civ. No. 03-027-SLR, 2003 WL 22843072, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21338 (D.Del. Nov. 21, 2003). Because the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Cordis’s motion, this court affirms.
I
Cordis Corp. owns U.S. Patent No. 4,739,762, which claims a balloon-expandable coronary stent. This court recently considered…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Comark Communications, Inc. v. Harris CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Pfaff v. Wells Electronics, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Reebok International Ltd. v. J. Baker, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Smith International, Inc., a California Corporation v. Hughes Tool Company, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Bell & Howell Document Management Products Company v. Altek Systems, and Keystone Jackets, Inc. And George WrabelCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Cordis Corp. v. Boston Scientific Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Cordis Corp. v. Medtronic Ave, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Cordis Corp. v. Boston Scientific Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. v. Medtronic Vascular, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2008
- I4i Ltd. Partnership v. Microsoft Corp.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.