Legal Opinion
Cordis Corp. v. Boston Scientific Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided September 28, 2011No. 2010-1311, 2010-1316PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GAJARSA, Circuit Judge.
Cordis Corporation (“Cordis”) appeals the United States District Court for the District of Delaware’s grant of judgment as a matter of law (“JMOL”) that Boston Scientific Corporation and Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. (collectively, “BSC”) do not literally infringe claim 25 of U.S. Patent No. 5,879,370. Cordis also appeals the district court’s denial of JMOL on the issue of noninfringement by the reverse doctrine of equivalents. BSC cross-appeals the district court’s judgment that U.S. Patent Nos. 5,643,312 (the “'312 patent”) and 5,879,370 (the “'370 patent”) are not…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Therasense, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson and Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Star Scientific, Inc. v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- City of Sherrill v. Oneida Indian Nation of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling, Inc. v. Maersk Drilling Usa, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Wi-Lan, Inc. v. Apple Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Mformation Technologies, Inc. v. Research in Motion Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Homeland Housewares, LLC v. Whirlpool CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Fastship, LLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.