Carroll v. City of Westminster
District Court, D. Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
GARBIS, District Judge.
The Court has before it the Motion of Defendants City of Westminster and Chief Sam Leppo for Summary Judgment, Defendant Middleton’s Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment, Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, and the materials submitted by the parties relating thereto. The Court finds that a hearing is unnecessary.
As discussed herein, this case presents the question whether Defendants City of Westminster (“Westminster”), Westminster Police Chief Sam Leppo (“Leppo”), and John W. Middleton, M.D. (“Dr.Middleton”), violated the…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Samuels v. TschechtelinCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Smith v. DanielczykCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Luy v. Baltimore Police DepartmentDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2004
- Murphy-Taylor v. HofmannDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2013
- Mercer v. City of Cedar RapidsDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.