Mercer v. City of Cedar Rapids
District Court, N.D. Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
BENNETT, Chief Judge.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. INTRODUCTION. IQ CO
A. Procedural Background. IQ CO
B. Factual Background. CD CO
II. LEGAL ANALYSIS. 05 CO T-t t — d
A. Standards For Summary Judgment. 05 CO T — I r — I
B. Constitutional Claims.1140
1. Mercer’s equal protection claim.1140
a. Elements of the claim.1140
b. Were Mercer and Peters “similarly situated”?.1141
i. The defendants’ difference based on “rank”.1142
ii. The plaintiff’s “accusation of the same conduct” test.1142
Hi The proper test .1143
iv. ’’Probationary” versus…
2Cases cited135 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
130 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Teresa L. Mercer, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross v. City of Cedar Rapids William Byrne, Defendants-Appellees/crossCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
- Gregory Winskowski v. City of StephenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- Walsted v. Woodbury County, IADistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2000
- St. Croix v. University of Colorado Health Sciences CenterColorado Court of Appeals · 2007
- Gorman v. Wells Manufacturing Corp.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.