Hassall v. Wilcox
Supreme Court of the United States
APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP. THE _ UNITED STATES POR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OP TEXAS. ' The case is stated in the opinion óf the court. cited: Hassall v. Wilcox, 115 U. S. 598; Fosdick v. Schall, 99 U. S. 235; Brooks v. Railway Company, 101 U. S. 443. cited: Hassall v. Wilcox, 115 U. S. 599; Fosdick v. Schall, 99 U. S. 235; Jeffrey v. Moran, 101 U. S. 285; Union Trust Co. v. Souther, 107 U. S. 591; Union Trust Co. v. Walker, 107 U. S. 596; Burnham v. Bowen, 111 U. S. 776;…
Read the full summary
APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP. THE _ UNITED STATES POR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OP TEXAS. ' The case is stated in the opinion óf the court. cited: Hassall v. Wilcox, 115 U. S. 598; Fosdick v. Schall, 99 U. S. 235; Brooks v. Railway Company, 101 U. S. 443. cited: Hassall v. Wilcox, 115 U. S. 599; Fosdick v. Schall, 99 U. S. 235; Jeffrey v. Moran, 101 U. S. 285; Union Trust Co. v. Souther, 107 U. S. 591; Union Trust Co. v. Walker, 107 U. S. 596; Burnham v. Bowen, 111 U. S. 776; Union Trust Co. v. Morrison, 125 U. S. 591, 607.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Beatcheord
On the 18th of February, 1879, an act was passed by the State of Texas, (General Laws of 1879, c. 12,) entitled “ An act to protect mechanics, laborers and operatives on railroad's against, the failure of owners, contractors and sub-contractors or agents to pay their wages when due, and provide a lien for such wages,” which provided as follows:
“ Section 1. Be it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Texas, That all mechanics, laborers and operatives who may have performed labor in the construction or repair of any railroad, locomotive, car, or other equipment to a railroad, or who may…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Windsor v. McVeighSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Fosdick v. SchallSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Union Trust Co. v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Hassall v. WilcoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
3Cited by41 opinions
- Grannis v. OrdeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Louisville Trust Co. v. City of CincinnatiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
- Cantor v. SachsCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1932
- Berthold-Jennings Lumber Co. v. St. Louis, I. M. & S. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
- Central Trust Co. v. CondonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1895
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.