Central Trust Co. v. Condon
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
'Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern Division of the Eastern District of Tennessee. This was a suit by the Central Trust Company of New York to foreclose a mortgage given by the Marietta & North Georgia Railway Company, with which, was consolidated a suit by V. E. McBee and others against the Central Trust Company and others to restrain the prosecution of the foreclosure suit and of other claims against the property on which they claimed…
Read the full summary
'Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern Division of the Eastern District of Tennessee. This was a suit by the Central Trust Company of New York to foreclose a mortgage given by the Marietta & North Georgia Railway Company, with which, was consolidated a suit by V. E. McBee and others against the Central Trust Company and others to restrain the prosecution of the foreclosure suit and of other claims against the property on which they claimed liens, and praying for a sale and payment of their claims from the proceeds. All creditors were directed to file their claims…
1Opinion of the CourtTaft, Circuit Judge
Of the questions left open by the decision on the former appeal, the principal one now to be determined is that of the amount owing by the Knoxville Bou them Railroad Company to George 15. Eager. The first important point of difference between the parties is in respect to the liability of Eager under the contract to furnish the railroad company with a complete equipment of rolling stock. The master reported that Eager was bound to supply rolling stock, and that, not having done so, he was chargeable with the sum required for the purpose. The circuit court sustained tiie exception to this…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Trustees v. GreenoughSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Central Railroad & Banking Co. of Ga. v. PettusSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Hobbs v. McLeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Keokuk & Hamilton Bridge Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Chemical Nat. Bank v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1893
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Richmond & I. Const. Co. v. Richmond, N., I. & B. R.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1895
- Reynolds v. Whitin MacH. WorksCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1948
- McCourt v. Singers-BiggerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
- Jones v. Great Southern Fireproof Hotel Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1898
- Pennsylvania Steel Co. v. New York City Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.