Legal Opinion

Harrison v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 7, 2005No. COA04-989PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WYNN, Judge.

In order to succeed on a motion for class certification, the moving party must demonstrate, inter alia, that: (1) the named and unnamed members of the proposed class have an interest in the same issues of law or fact; (2) common issues predominates over issues affecting only individual class members; and (3) no conflicts of interest exist between the named representatives and members of the class. Crow v. Citicorp Acceptance Co., 319 N.C. 274, 280-82, 354 S.E.2d 459, 464-65 (1987). In this case, in which Plaintiffs Alex Harrison, Karen Hicks, and Patricia Polk, on behalf of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. Poor v. HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  3. Goldston v. American Motors Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  4. Creech v. MelnikSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  5. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Lopez, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2002

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Braun v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Armijo v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Blitz v. Agean, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  4. Connor v. HarlessCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  5. Hale v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2007

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API