Harrison v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WYNN, Judge.
In order to succeed on a motion for class certification, the moving party must demonstrate, inter alia, that: (1) the named and unnamed members of the proposed class have an interest in the same issues of law or fact; (2) common issues predominates over issues affecting only individual class members; and (3) no conflicts of interest exist between the named representatives and members of the class. Crow v. Citicorp Acceptance Co., 319 N.C. 274, 280-82, 354 S.E.2d 459, 464-65 (1987). In this case, in which Plaintiffs Alex Harrison, Karen Hicks, and Patricia Polk, on behalf of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Poor v. HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Goldston v. American Motors Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
- Creech v. MelnikSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Lopez, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2002
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Braun v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Armijo v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
- Blitz v. Agean, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- Connor v. HarlessCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
- Hale v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2007
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.