Legal Opinion
Giroux v. Fortis Benefits Insurance
District Court, D. Maine
Decided January 11, 2005No. CIV.04-104-P-CPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
GENE CARTER, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiff Robert L. Giroux initiated this suit against Defendant Fortis Benefits Insurance Co. (“Fortis”), in which he alleges violations of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001, et seq. Now before the Court are Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket Item No. 11) and Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket Item No. 8). The Court has thoroughly reviewed the Motions and written submissions thereon,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Black & Decker Disability Plan v. NordSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- McCarthy v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Dana Blackie v. State of MaineCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- City of Milwaukee v. Cement Division, National Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Curran v. Camden National Corp.District Court, D. Maine · 2007
- Eusebio Cotto Villegas v. Federal Express Corp.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2006
- Coffin v. Bowater Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 2005