Eusebio Cotto Villegas v. Federal Express Corp.
District Court, D. Puerto Rico
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
PEREZ-GIMENEZ, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Eusebio Cotto-Villegas (“Cot-to”), his wife Ana Santana-Concepción, and their Conjugal Partnership (collectively referred to as “plaintiffs”) filed the above-styled and captioned suit pursuant to the Employment Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. Their main allegation is that Cotto, who is a participant in a short term disability benefit plan (“STD”) administered by defendant Federal Express Corporation (“FedEx” or “defendant”) was arbitrarily denied STD benefits. Also, Cotto alleges…
2Cases cited59 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- González-Ríos v. Hewlett Packard P.R. Co.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2012
- Padilla v. Triple-S, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2007