Legal Opinion
Curran v. Camden National Corp.
District Court, D. Maine
Decided July 26, 2007No. CV-06-104-B-WPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES
JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR., District Judge.
Concluding that Camden National Corporation has not satisfied the five-factor test for a fee-shifting award under the Employee Retirement Insurance Security Act (ERISA), the Court denies its motion for award of attorney’s fees.
I. BACKGROUND
On September 6, 2006, several trustees of the Bankers’ Health Trust (Trust) filed suit against Camden National Corporation (CNC), alleging breach of contract, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, breach of fiduciary duty in violation of ERISA, and civil…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Sereboff v. Mid Atlantic Medical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Eaves v. PennCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
- Cottrill v. Sparrow, Johnson & Ursillo, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Janeiro v. Urological Surgery Professional Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
- Twomey v. Delta Airlines Pilots Pension PlanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Camarlinghi v. Santa Clara CountyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022
- Clover v. Camp Pendleton & Quantico Housing LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2023
- In re Progenity, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2026
- Mario Cortez v. Vieira Custom Chopping, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2020