Legal Opinion

In Re Marriage of Neal

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 9, 1979No. Civ. 44100PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RATTIGAN, J.

The wife appeals from specified portions of an amended interlocutory judgment entered in a proceeding for dissolution of the parties’ marriage.

Appellant commenced the proceeding by filing a petition for dissolution in 1975. It eventually came on for trial 19 months later. The parties had by then reached agreement on some aspects of a division of their marital property, but not on custody and support of their two small children, spousal support, and certain other issues. Pursuant to a stipulation between them, the trial court received extrinsic evidence on the unresolved…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Gudelj v. GudeljCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. In Re Marriage of MorrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. In Re Marriage of EpsteinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Ferreira v. FerreiraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Burge v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of AllenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
  2. McClain v. McClainAlaska Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Calia v. CaliaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Monterey County v. CornejoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  5. In Re Marriage of HarrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API