Brown v. Ward
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MATTHEWS, Justice.
The question in this case is whether shareholder proxies were obtained through materially misleading representations. The superior court held the solicitation in question to be proper and dismissed the complaint below. We disagree and reverse.
Cook Inlet Region, Inc., is an Alaska business corporation formed under AS 10.05. It is designated under the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act, 43 U.S.C. §§ 1601-1628 (Supp.1978) to receive benefits as a regional corporation. Cook Inlet has approximately six thousand shareholders, each owning one hundred shares of common stock.
I…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Union Pacific Railroad v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1964
- Kaufman v. ShoenbergCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1952
- Empire Southern Gas Co. v. GrayCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1946
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Broad v. Sealaska Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Toombs v. LeoneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Moses v. McGarveyAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
- Thomas v. BaileyAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Pullen v. UlmerAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.