Legal Opinion

Twin Falls Bank & Trust Co. v. City Electric Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1959PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBedding, J.

(Pro Tempore)

This is an appeal by the defendants from a judgment of the circuit court in an action tried to the court without a jury. At the conclusion of the trial, the defendants, as well as the plaintiff, requested and were granted permission to submit special findings.

The following sequence of events occurred after the conclusion of the trial on February 15, 1957. On February 20 defendants were served with Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law requested by plaintiff. These findings, together with a judgment based thereon, were signed by the trial judge on February 26 and filed in the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Noland v. BullOregon Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Hicklin v. McClearOregon Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Luper v. WertsOregon Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Weinstein v. WheelerOregon Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Williams v. RaganOregon Supreme Court · 1944

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Aiken v. Shell Oil Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Hoffee v. Salem Yellow Cab Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Gordon Creek Tree Farms, Inc. v. LayneOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Gordon Creek Tree Farms, Inc. v. LayneOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  5. In re the Marriage of T.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API