Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Meaney v. State Industrial Accident Commission

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1925PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCo Show, J.

In our opinion the State Industrial Accident Commission has no discretion in this matter. The direction of the judgment of the court required the Commission to reinstate the plaintiff under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, as amended; to fix the amount of plaintiff’s compensation on the basis of permanent total disability in accordance with the schedule of said act as amended; to compute the full balance of unpaid compensation accrued and accruing to the plaintiff from the date of the injury. It is the duty of the Industrial Accident Commission to faithfully execute the judgment. There is no…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Meaney v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rosell v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Barry v. Peterson Motor Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Casaday v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1925
  4. State ex rel. Griffin v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1934
  5. State Ex Rel. v. State Ind. Acc. Comm.Oregon Supreme Court · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API