Deckelbaum v. Cooter, Mangold, Tompert & Chapman, P.L.L.C.
District Court, D. Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
NICKERSON, District Judge.
Before the Court is Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Paper No. 37. Defendants have opposed the motion. Upon a review of the pleadings and applicable case law, the Court determines that no hearing is necessary (Local Rule 105.6) and that Plaintiffs motion will be granted.
I. BACKGROUND
A more detailed discussion of the lengthy history of this case appears in an earlier memorandum issued by this Court. Deckelbaum v. Cooter, Mangold, Tompert & Chapman, P.L.L.C., 2000 WL 1593467 (D.Md. Oct.20, 2000) (Civil Action No. 99-1586). Only facts relevant…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- N. Brown FELTY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GRAVES-HUMPHREYS COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
- Bankr. L. Rep. P 73,583, 12 Ucc rep.serv.2d 549 in the Matter of Vitreous Steel Products Company, Debtor. Appeal of Lynn M. Miller, Trustee and Northern Indiana Public Service CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Barr v. Charterhouse Group International, Inc. (In Re Everfresh Beverages, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Rosen v. Dahan (In Re Minh Vu Hoang)District Court, D. Maryland · 2012
- Burtch v. Ganz (In Re Mushroom Transportation Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
- Deckelbaum v. Cooter, Mangold, Tompert & Chapman, P.L.L.C.District Court, D. Maryland · 2003
- Rosen v. Dahan (In Re Minh Vu Hoang)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 2011
- Rosen v. DahanDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2012