Legal Opinion
Rosen v. Dahan
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided November 29, 2012No. Civil Action No. DKC 11-2320PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
DEBORAH K. CHASANOW, District Judge.
Presently pending and ready for resolution in this bankruptcy appeal is a motion to alter or amend judgment filed by Appellant Gary A. Rosen (ECF No. 13); a motion to strike filed by Appellees David Dahan, Sarit Dahan, Karin Dahan, Maia, LLC, Rokama, LLC, and Raymonde, LLC (ECF No. 16); and Appellant’s motion for retroactive extension of time in which to file a motion for rehearing (ECF No. 19). The relevant issues have been briefed, and the court now rules pursuant to Local Rule 105.6, no hearing being deemed necessary. For the reasons…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Bonded Financial Services, Inc., Debtor-Appellant v. European American BankCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- In Re: Russell Schwartz Linda Schwartz, Debtors. Russell Schwartz Linda Schwartz v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Matrix Capital Management Fund v. BearingPoint, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Harrison-Solomon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
- Anusie-Howard v. ToddDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2013