Legal Opinion

Hennepin County Welfare Board v. Booth

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 8, 1958No. Nos. 37,388, 37,405PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nelson, Justice.

This case involves two appeals from orders of the District Court of Hennepin County. Generally, it involves the question whether Martin and Michael Booth were dependent children within the meaning of M. S. A. 260.01. Other questions involved are: (1) Whether the evidence sustains the finding that Martin and Michael Booth were neglected children within the meaning of § 260.01; (2) whether there was diligent effort on the part of the Hennepin County Welfare Board prior to the commitment order to avoid the separation of the said children from their mother; (3) whether the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cochran v. ToherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1869
  2. Aske v. AskeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  3. Molto v. MoltoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  4. State Ex Rel. Jaroszewski v. PrestidgeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  5. Karrib v. BaileyMichigan Supreme Court · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Welfare of J.R.B.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
  2. In Re Dependency of KlugmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  3. In Re BoothSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  4. Hursh v. KlugmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API