Legal Opinion
In Re Booth
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided August 8, 1958No. 37,388, 37,405PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
253 Minn. 395 (1958)
91 N.W. (2d) 921
IN RE MARTIN AND MICHAEL BOOTH.
HENNEPIN COUNTY WELFARE BOARD
v.
LORRAINE C. BOOTH.
Nos. 37,388, 37,405.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
August 8, 1958.
Hall, Smith, Hedlund, Juster, Forsberg & Merlin, for appellant.
George M. Scott, County Attorney, and Theodore R. Rix and Douglas X. Juneau, Assistant County Attorneys, for respondent.
NELSON, JUSTICE.
This case involves two appeals from orders of the District Court of Hennepin County. Generally, it involves the question whether Martin and Michael Booth were dependent children within the meaning of M.S.A. 260.01. Other…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cochran v. ToherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1869
- Aske v. AskeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- Molto v. MoltoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- State Ex Rel. Jaroszewski v. PrestidgeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- Karrib v. BaileyMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re Dependency of KlugmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- Hursh v. KlugmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959