Legal Opinion

State v. Smathers

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 1979No. 15911PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Chief Justice:

Defendant Danny Wayne Smathers appeals from a jury conviction of aggravated sexual assault a first-degree felony. 1 He makes these claims of error: that the information was not sufficiently specific to inform him of the accusation against him; and that the charge of misconduct is proscribed by two different statutes with different penalties and that he should be entitled to be convicted and punished under the lesser of the two.

As is invariably true in such cases, the defendant’s version of what occurred is different in vital aspects from the State’s evidence. Where…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. SiddowayUtah Supreme Court · 1922
  2. State v. LovelessUtah Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State v. WilcoxUtah Supreme Court · 1972
  4. State v. StitesUtah Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Lee Ex Rel. Lee v. HowesUtah Supreme Court · 1976

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. PreeceCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1998
  2. State v. CudeUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. GomezUtah Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State v. SnyderCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1997
  5. State v. CasiasCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API