State v. Stites

HENRIOD, Justice.

Appeal from a conviction for misapplication of corporate moneys. Affirmed.

Appellant urges that 1) the information was insufficient to apprise him as to the offense with which he was to be tried or as to the facts constituting any particular offense, 2) that the court erred in refusing to grant motions to dismiss and in arrest of judgment, 3) that a motion for mistrial should have been granted, 4) that certain evidence was admitted erroneously and 5) that certain instructions were erroneously given or denied.

The information read as follows:

“That on or about the 3rd day of Dec.…