Legal Opinion

State v. Gomez

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1986No. 20520PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZIMMERMAN, Justice:

The State of Utah appeals from the trial court’s order dismissing an information charging Steve and Jacqueline Gomez with wrongful use of a financial transaction card under section 76-6-506.1 of the Code. The trial court found that sections 76-6-506.1 and 76-6-506.2 proscribed identical conduct, that section 76-6-506.2 carried a lesser penalty, and that the defendants were entitled to be charged with the lesser crime. We conclude that the statutes do not proscribe the same conduct because they do not contain the same elements; therefore, we reverse..

In January of 1985, the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. ShondelUtah Supreme Court · 1969
  2. State v. BryanUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  3. State v. TwitchellUtah Supreme Court · 1959
  4. State v. ClarkUtah Supreme Court · 1981
  5. State v. WaddoupsUtah Supreme Court · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. BluffUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. JeffriesUtah Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. BankheadUtah Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State v. WolfCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014
  5. State v. KentCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1997

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API