Legal Opinion

26 Fair empl.prac.cas. 721, 26 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 32,063, 2 Employee Benefits Ca 1770 Marie Manhart, Carolyn Mayshack, Margerie Stoop, Alice F. Muller and Ethel L. Lehman, Individually and on Behalf of All Other Persons Similarly Situated Committee to Protect Women's Retirement Benefits and International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union No. 18 v. City of Los Angeles, Department of Water and Power, a Body Corporate and Politic Members of the Board of Water and Power Commissioners of the Department of Water and Power, City of Los Angeles Members of the Board of Administration of the Department of Water and Power Employees' Retirement, Disability and Death Benefits Insurance Plan Henry G. Bodkin, Jr. Katherine B. Dunlap Burton J. Gindler Michael Glazer Herbert C. Ward Louis J. Weidner, Jr. Ralph E. Powell Leo W. Sudmeier, Jr. William D. Sachau and Robert v. Phillips

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 16, 1981No. 79-3225PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

652 F.2d 904

26 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 721,

26 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 32,063,

2 Employee Benefits Ca 1770

Marie MANHART, Carolyn Mayshack, Margerie Stoop, Alice F.

Muller and Ethel L. Lehman, individually and on behalf of

all other persons similarly situated; Committee to Protect

Women's Retirement Benefits; and International Brotherhood

of Electrical Workers, Local Union No. 18, Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.

CITY OF LOS ANGELES, DEPARTMENT OF WATER AND POWER, a body

corporate and politic; Members of the Board of Water and

Power Commissioners of the Department of Water and Power,

City of Los Angeles; Members of the…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  2. Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  4. Dolores J. Copeland, Individually and on Behalf of the Class of All Others Similarly Situated v. F. Ray Marshall, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  5. Hanrahan v. HamptonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. In Re Nucorp Energy, Inc., an Ohio Corporation, and Its Affiliates, Debtors. Luce, Forward, Hamilton & ScrippsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  2. Serrano v. UnruhCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. George E. Vanelli, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Reynolds School District No. 7, Defendants-Appellees/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  4. Jordan v. Multnomah CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  5. Moore v. Jas. H. Matthews & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API