Legal Opinion
Pate v. United States
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 6, 2004No. CIV.A. 02-1529 RBWPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WALTON, District Judge.
Currently before the Court is Defendant United States’ Motion for Summary Judgment (“Def.’s Mot.”) [DE #30] and the plaintiffs opposition thereto. The plaintiff, Anthony Pate, brings this action against the United States alleging that the United States Parole Commission (“USPC”) and its employees caused him to be wrongfully detained for an alleged parole violation. In support of its motion for summary judgment, the United States advances three grounds upon which it contends the Court should rule in its favor: “(1) [the pjlaintiffs claims are barred by…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Carlson v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Zuzanna Juris v. Inamed CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
- Carter-El v. District of Columbia Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Stoddard v. U.S. Parole CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- State, Department of Health & Social Services v. OkuleyAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
- Keepseagle v. JohannsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.