Legal Opinion
Zuzanna Juris v. Inamed Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided July 6, 2012No. 10-12665PublishedCited by 68 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ANDERSON, Circuit Judge:
In 1999, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama approved a mandatory, limited fund class settlement, which resolved tens of thousands of claims arising out of injuries allegedly caused by defective silicone breast implants manufactured by Inamed Corporation (“Inamed”). Several years later, in 2006, Zuzanna Juris filed an individual action in California state court against Inamed and Allergan, Inc. (“Allergan”), Inamed’s successor, alleging injuries caused by her Inamed implants. The defendants contended that Juris’s lawsuit was barred…
2Cases cited64 opinions
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Dombrowski v. PfisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- Vince Mullins v. Direct Digital, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- Robert Briseno v. Conagra Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Julia McCreight v. Auburn BankCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2024
- Timothy Cherry v. Dometic CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021
- In re Oil Spill by the Oil Rig "Deepwater Horizon"District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2012
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.