Legal Opinion
Stoddard v. U.S. Parole Commission
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 26, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2012-0857PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JAMES E. BOASBERG, District Judge.
Plaintiff Keith Stoddard has brought this pro se action against the U.S. Parole Commission, its chairman Isaac Fulwood, and two other USPC employees relating to his detention for a parole violation. Defendants now move to dismiss the Complaint on several independent grounds, including improper service and various forms of immunity. As Plaintiff has abjured any individual-capacity claims, and as the principles of sovereign immunity and administrative exhaustion protect the USPC itself here, the Court will grant the Motion.
I. Background
Accordin…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- McNeil v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Victor Herbert v. National Academy of SciencesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Fludd v. MitchellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Miller v. Dist. of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Curne v. Small Business AdministrationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
- Davidson v. MegrotaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- Davis v. U.S. Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.