Legal Opinion
Kunsman v. Conkright
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided October 16, 2013No. 08-CV-6080LPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
DAVID G. LARIMER, District Judge.
This action is one of several before the Court involving similar claims under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1101 et seq., by current and former employees of Xerox Corporation (“Xerox”), relating to the manner in which plaintiffs’ pension benefits have been calculated.1 The details of the claims in this action will be explained below, but in short, they relate to the treatment of prior distributions of plaintiffs’ accrued benefits when calculating plaintiffs’ current or future benefits.
Currently pending…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Aetna Health Inc. v. DavilaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Connecticut General Life Insurance v. Advanced Chiropractic HealthcareDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- Testa v. BeckerDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2013
- Anderson v. Xerox Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 2014
- Kunsman v. Sally ConkrightDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2019
- Rapp v. Henkel of America, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2019