Legal Opinion

Rodgers v. Rodgers

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1994No. 23390PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Appellant Robert Rodgers (“Robert”) seeks a modification of the child support obligations owed by his ex-wife, Sandra Rodgers (“Sandra”). According to Robert, Sandra’s child support payments should be increased to reflect her community property interest in her new husband’s earnings. The district court denied Robert’s motion without explanation. Because we conclude that a parent’s community property interest in a new spouse’s earnings may, under some circumstances, constitute proper grounds for modifying a child support award, we reverse the district court’s order and remand for…

3Cases cited13 opinions

  1. McKay v. Board of Sup'rs of Carson CityNevada Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Charlie Brown Construction Co. v. City of Boulder CityNevada Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Paramount Insurance, Inc. v. Rayson & SmitleyNevada Supreme Court · 1970
  4. State ex rel. Brockliss v. JepsenNevada Supreme Court · 1922
  5. DeTevis v. AragonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by8 opinions

  1. Williams v. Clark County District AttorneyNevada Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Anthony Lee R., a Minor v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Metz v. MetzNevada Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Jackson v. JacksonNevada Supreme Court · 1995
  5. In Re GalvezNevada Supreme Court · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API