Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Aurick

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 13, 1939No. Appeal, 260PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rhodes, J.,

Defendant was tried on three indictments in which he was charged with involuntary manslaughter, unlawful failure to stop and render assistance, and aggravated assault and battery by automobile, respectively. He was convicted of involuntary manslaughter only. His motion for a new trial having been refused and sentence imposed, he has appealed.

The assignments of error do not necessitate an elaborate statement of the facts. They relate to the charge of the court, the limitation of the cross-examination of a commonwealth witness, the refusal of a new trial, and the entering…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ExlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  2. Commonwealth v. MicusoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  3. Commonwealth v. ErnestoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  4. Hutchinson v. Follmer Trucking Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Commonwealth v. GillSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RootSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  2. Commonwealth v. AurickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  3. Commonwealth v. KlickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  4. Finnerty v. DarbySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  5. Cutshall v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1941

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API