Legal Opinion

Finnerty v. Darby

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 16, 1958No. Appeal, 246PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion, by

Mr. Justice Chidsey,

As a result of a collision between an automobile owned and driven by the plaintiff James W. Finnerty and a truck owned by the defendant Carmelétta V. Darby, doing business as Darby Transfer and Storage, and driven by the latter’s employe, Harry Lloyd Cooke, plaintiff brought this action in trespass to recover for personal injuries sustained and damage done to his car. The defendant filed a counterclaim for .dámage *303done to the truck. At the end of a lengthy trial the jury tendered a verdict which read: “Both parties were guilty of contributory negligence”. With…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Sherman v. Manufacturers Light & Heat Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Commonwealth v. ForreySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  3. Risbon v. CottomSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  4. Commonwealth v. MoonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  5. Miller v. Exeter BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Evans v. Otis Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  2. Sprague v. WalterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Betz v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  4. State v. ClaytonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  5. Havasy v. ResnickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API