Legal Opinion · Dissent

Merchants Parcel Delivery, Inc. v. Pa. Public Utility Commission

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 13, 1941No. Appeal, 185Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by

Keller, P. J.:

I am in substantial accord with the views expressed by Commissioner Buchanan in his dissenting opinion. For the reasons given by him in that opinion, I enter my dissent.

The opinion of Commissioner Buchanan is as follows:

It is my opinion that the present application for a contract carrier’s permit should be refused because the applicant is actually engaged in common carriage. United Parcel is presently serving four mercantile stores as a contract carrier. Through solicitation, persuasion, coercion and purchase, it now seeks to increase that number to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Masgai v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission v. GornishSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. Brink's Express Co. v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  4. Aronimink Transportation Co. v. P. S. C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  5. Erb v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API