Merchants Parcel Delivery, Inc. v. Pa. Public Utility Commission
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Dissent
Dissenting Opinion by
Keller, P. J.:
I am in substantial accord with the views expressed by Commissioner Buchanan in his dissenting opinion. For the reasons given by him in that opinion, I enter my dissent.
The opinion of Commissioner Buchanan is as follows:
It is my opinion that the present application for a contract carrier’s permit should be refused because the applicant is actually engaged in common carriage. United Parcel is presently serving four mercantile stores as a contract carrier. Through solicitation, persuasion, coercion and purchase, it now seeks to increase that number to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Masgai v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission v. GornishSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Brink's Express Co. v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Aronimink Transportation Co. v. P. S. C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Erb v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.