Legal Opinion

Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission v. Gornish

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 21, 1938No. Appeal, 234PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Parker, J.,

Philadelphia-Pittsburgh Motor Express is a partnership, the members of which, since May 15, 1937, have been engaged in soliciting carriage of freight intrastate by motor vehicles on the public highways and, since about May 26,1937, have been actually engaged in transporting such freight. They never have had a certificate of public convenience from the state evidencing a right to perform such service. On August 17,1937, the Public Utility Commission instituted on its own motion an inquiry and investigation for the purpose of determining whether appellants were violating…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Lloyd v. HaughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  2. Beckman v. ShouseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1835
  3. Erb v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  4. Gordon v. HutchinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1841
  5. Bingaman v. Pub. Serv. Com.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Georgia Truck System, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
  2. Armour Transportation Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission v. W. J. Dillner Transfer Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  4. Circle Express Co. v. Iowa State Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1957
  5. Roberts v. Knoxville Transit LinesCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1952

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API