Legal Opinion

Oakland Water Front Co. v. Le Roy

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 7, 1922No. 3852PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUNT, Circuit Judge.

In an action in trespass committed in 1916, tried by the court, the Le Roys, plaintiffs below, recovered judgment for $20,000 damages against the Oakland Water Front Company. The land involved is known as tract 27 of the Alameda marsh land in Alameda estuary, California. As the water front -company was clearly guilty, the issue was the damage done to the lot.

It is gathered from the record that some years ago the parties to this litigation and others were tenants in common of a large tract, but by partition suit the acre involved in this action was set aside to the Le Roys,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Stanley v. Supervisors of AlbanySupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. City of Salem v. WebsterIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  3. People v. WestlakeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  4. State v. ForshaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1905
  5. Arthurs v. HartSupreme Court of the United States · 1854

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Certain Parcels of LandDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1953
  2. Erceg v. Fairbanks Exploration Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
  3. Clauson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
  4. Geiger v. TrampCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1923
  5. Northwest Theatres Co. v. HansonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API