Legal Opinion

Geiger v. Tramp

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided May 7, 1923No. 6035PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POLLOCK, District Judge.

This was an action at law, the petition containing 26 counts, brought to enforce payment of the contents of a like number of promissory notes madé to what is called a common-law trust, namely, The Clinton Townsite & Farm Development Com*354pany. Defendants were the trustees of said trust, and were sought to be maintained liable for the payment of the notes as individual indorsers of the paper. One of said notes, with the indorsement of defendants thereon, reads, as follows:

“350.00 Crestón, Iowa, July 29, 1912.
“On or before July 29, 1916, I promise to pay to the Clinton…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Armour Packing Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Board of Com'rs of Woodson CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
  3. Wear v. Imperial Window Glass Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915
  4. Block v. DarlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  5. City of Salem v. WebsterIllinois Supreme Court · 1901

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Mansfield Hardwood Lumber Co. v. HortonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929
  2. Allen v. Cartan & Jeffrey Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
  3. Emanuel v. Kansas City Title & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
  4. Federal Surety Co. v. Standard Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929
  5. United States v. Washington Dehydrated Food Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API