Legal Opinion

Arthurs v. Hart

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 19, 1854PublishedCited by 17 opinions

This ease was brought up, by writ of error, from the • circuit court of the United States for the eastern district of Louisiana. In 1847, Hart, who was a citizen, of Louisiana, employed Nicholson and Armstrong, of Pittsburg, Pennsylvania, to build and put up a sugar-mill and engine upon his plantation. The mill and engine were put up, and a part of the purchase-money paid.

Read the full summary

This ease was brought up, by writ of error, from the • circuit court of the United States for the eastern district of Louisiana. In 1847, Hart, who was a citizen, of Louisiana, employed Nicholson and Armstrong, of Pittsburg, Pennsylvania, to build and put up a sugar-mill and engine upon his plantation. The mill and engine were put up, and a part of the purchase-money paid. For the balance, a bill of exchange was drawn on March 1, 1848, by Nicholson and Armstrong upon, and accepted by,Hart, to the order of James Arthurs and Brothers, and by them indorsed to Arthurs, Nicholson, and Co. The bill…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Nelson

This is a writ of error to the circuit court of the United States for the eastern district of Louisiana. The plaintiffs seek to recover the amount of a bill of exchange, drawn by the firm of Nicholson and Armstrong, upon the defendant, for $2,540.65, and accepted by him, in favor of James Arthurs and Brothers, dated March 1, 1848, and payable twelve months from date, and indorsed by the payees to the plaintiffs. The bill of exchange is set forth in the petition, according to the practice in the State of Louisiana, with a prayer that the defendant be condemned to pay the amount due.

The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Zeller's Lessee v. EckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1846
  2. Seaman Field v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1834
  3. Withers v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
  4. Phillips v. PrestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1846

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Wetmore v. RymerSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Suydam v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
  3. Dower v. RichardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. Mitchell v. BeckmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Graham v. BayneSupreme Court of the United States · 1855

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API