Legal Opinion

Dawson v. Bowen

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided March 4, 1988No. C-2-84-1353PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

TERENCE P. KEMP, United States Magistrate Judge.

In this social security disability action, a dispute has arisen over the proper scope, if any, of the Plaintiff’s ability to gain inf or-*619mation through discovery. The Secretary originally found that Plaintiff did not suffer from a severe impairment. That conclusion was found to lack substantial evidence in support of it, and the case was remanded for a continuation of the sequential evaluation process. Upon remand, the Secretary again denied benefits. After the record of completed remand proceedings was filed in this Court, the Plaintiff…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Jeannette E. Hummel v. Margaret A. Heckler, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
  2. Ambrocio P. Igonia v. Joseph A. Califano, Jr., as Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
  3. Interstate Investors, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Albert E. Domanski v. Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare,defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1963
  5. Elm Grove Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Federal Home Loan Bank BoardDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1975

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dawson v. SullivanDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1991
  2. (SS)Courtney v. Social Security OfficeDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  3. Poirier v. SSADistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API