Legal Opinion

(SS)Courtney v. Social Security Office

District Court, E.D. California

Decided December 18, 2020No. 1:18-cv-01244Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 COLLEEN M. COURTNEY, Case No. 1:18-cv-01244-SAB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY TO FILE 13 v. ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD OR RESPONSIVE PLEADING WITHIN SIXTY 14 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL DAYS AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S SECURITY, REQUEST FOR A SUBPOENA 15 Defendant. (ECF No. 21) 16 17 On September 13, 2018, Colleen M. Courtney (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and in 18 forma pauperis, filed this action seeking judicial review of a decision of the Commissioner of 19 Social Security…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Califano v. YamasakiSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Heckler v. RingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Shalala v. Illinois Council on Long Term Care, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Jeannette E. Hummel v. Margaret A. Heckler, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
  5. Dawson v. SullivanDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API