Legal Opinion

Dawson v. Sullivan

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided March 7, 1991No. C-2-84-1353PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

TERENCE P. KEMP, United States Magistrate Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This is a social security disability case. It has been pending for some time because the parties have been engaged in a dispute about discovery. The history and nature of that dispute can be found in my order of March 4, 1988, 136 F.R.D. 618, which granted plaintiff’s motion to compel discovery; in my status conference memorandum of February 8, 1990, which set up a procedure for in camera review of certain documents by the Court, and in Judge Hol-schuh’s memorandum and order of September 24, 1990. That order…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Environmental Protection Agency v. MinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Coastal States Gas Corporation v. Department of EnergyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  4. United States Department of Justice v. JulianSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kevin Weeks v. Social Security Administration CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
  2. Roberson v. BarnhartDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2003
  3. (SS)Courtney v. Social Security OfficeDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  4. Davis v. Secretary, Department of Homeland SecurityDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2022
  5. Leffler v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API