Legal Opinion
POPA v. HARRIET CARTER GIFTS, INC.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 17, 2021No. 2:19-cv-00450Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ASHLEY POPA, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 2:19-cv-450 V. Hon. William S. Stickman IV HARRIET CARTER GIFTS, INC. a Pennsylvania corporation and NAVISTONE, INC. a Delaware corporation, Defendants. OPINION WILLIAM S. STICKMAN IV, United States District Judge Plaintiff, Ashley Popa (“Popa”), brought this class action on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated against Defendants, Harriet Carter Gifts, Inc. (“Harriet Carter”) and Navistone, Inc.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Marie Saldana v. Kmart Corporation Marie Saldana, in No. 99-4055Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- In Re Google Inc. Cookie Placement Consumer Privacy LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
- Charles Spence v. Esab Grp IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.