Legal Opinion

Charles Spence v. Esab Grp Inc

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided October 18, 2010No. 09-4363PublishedCited by 110 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

YANASKIE, Circuit Judge.

This appeal calls upon us to determine whether Pennsylvania law imposes upon a shipper a duty of due care to safely secure the goods the shipper has loaded in a third-party carrier’s tractor-trailer. The District Court, concluding that Pennsylvania law did not impose such a duty, awarded summary judgment in favor of the shipper, The ESAB Group, Inc. (“ESAB”), and against the carrier’s injured driver, appellant Charles Spence. Because we find that, under the circumstances of this case, Pennsylvania law imposed a duty of care on ESAB, we will reverse…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Feld v. MerriamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Althaus Ex Rel. Althaus v. CohenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. R.W. v. ManzekSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by110 opinions

  1. Ana Alpizar-Fallas v. Frank FaveroCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
  2. Meyer v. Cuna Mutual Insurance SocietyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
  3. Wendell Brown v. PoormanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
  4. Lomando v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
  5. Roth v. NORFALCO LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011

105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API