Charles Spence v. Esab Grp Inc
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
YANASKIE, Circuit Judge.
This appeal calls upon us to determine whether Pennsylvania law imposes upon a shipper a duty of due care to safely secure the goods the shipper has loaded in a third-party carrier’s tractor-trailer. The District Court, concluding that Pennsylvania law did not impose such a duty, awarded summary judgment in favor of the shipper, The ESAB Group, Inc. (“ESAB”), and against the carrier’s injured driver, appellant Charles Spence. Because we find that, under the circumstances of this case, Pennsylvania law imposed a duty of care on ESAB, we will reverse…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Feld v. MerriamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Althaus Ex Rel. Althaus v. CohenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- R.W. v. ManzekSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by110 opinions
- Ana Alpizar-Fallas v. Frank FaveroCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- Meyer v. Cuna Mutual Insurance SocietyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- Wendell Brown v. PoormanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- Lomando v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- Roth v. NORFALCO LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.