Legal Opinion

Baker v. Thomas

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1918No. 19827PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from the district court for Scott’s Bluff county: Balph W. Hobart, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtCornish, J.

Action upon a promissory note given in part payment for a patent right. The defense, besides deny*402ing liability on the note, seeks judgment on a counterclaim for damages for fraudulent representations at the time of the purchase of an interest in that patent right. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

The defendant contends that the note as alleged is non-negotiable, and, there being no allegation in the petition that it was given for a consideration, no cause of action is stated. The note does, however, show that it was given “for value received.” These words import a consideration, and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Owens v. BlackburnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
  2. Bourne v. WardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1863

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Shotwell v. First National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Rasmussen v. Hungerford Potato Growers Ass'nNebraska Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Thompson v. JostNebraska Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Petersen v. DethlefsNebraska Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Aron v. Mid-Continent Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1942

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API