Legal Opinion

Shotwell v. First National Bank

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1934No. 28796PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPaine, J.

*378This action is founded upon a claim, filed against decedent’s estate, upon a nonnegotiable promissory note, which recites, “For value received.” The claim was rejected in the county court, and, upon appeal to the district court, trial was begun to a jury, but a judgment was entered discharging the jury and rejecting the claim.

William W. Hoagland, of Omaha, died December 9, 1931, and Margaret B. Shotwell filed a claim against his estate, founded upon a note executed by Hoagland, which read as follows:

“November 20, 1931.
“For value received I promise to pay to Margaret B. Shotwell the sum of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Dougherty v. . SaltNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. Central National Bank v. EricsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Smith Sand & Gravel Co. v. CorbinWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Blanshan v. RussellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  5. Gilmore v. Modern Brotherhood of AmericaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. People v. StewartMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  2. McNaught v. New York Life InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Roberts v. RogersNebraska Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Edwards v. YorkNebraska Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Schroeder v. BartlettNebraska Supreme Court · 1935

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API