Legal Opinion

Aron v. Mid-Continent Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 1942No. 31334PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMessmore, J.

This is an action to rescind a contract for the purchase of capital stock, charging defendants with fraud. The jury returned a verdict against defendant Mid-Continent Company in the sum of $3,728.50. Motion for a new trial was overruled, judgment entered in accordance with the verdict, and the Mid-Continent Company (hereinafter referred to as defendant) appeals.

The petition sets forth certain evidentiary facts disclosing fraud practiced upon the plaintiffs, all of which is denied by defendant’s answer.

The principal assignment of error is: The court erred in holding that the offer made by the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Snow v. AlleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
  2. American Building & Loan Ass'n v. RainboltNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Collins v. HughesNebraska Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Loomis v. PeaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
  5. Clark v. TennantNebraska Supreme Court · 1877

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Koperski v. Husker Dodge, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Aron v. Mid-Continent Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Bennett v. Emerald Service, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Vavricka v. Mid-Continent-Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API