Potrero Neuvo Land Co. v. All Persons Claiming
California Supreme Court
MOTION to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Frank J. Murasky, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
Plaintiff brought its action under the provisions of the MeEnemey Act to establish and quiet its title to certain lands within the city and county of San Francisco. Theresa Cuneo and Auguste Deprette appeared, pleaded title each respectively to one fifty-vara lot embraced within the lands described in the complaint, and asked for a judgment of dismissal of the complaint as to themselves and the lasids in question. The court, for reasons not necessary here to consider, gave judgment “that said complaint be and the same is hereby dismissed as to defendants Theresa Cuneo and Auguste Deprette.”…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ryer v. RyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- In Re the Estate of McPheeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Kenney v. ParksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Niles v. GonzalezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
3Cited by8 opinions
- Mitchell v. Banking Corp. of MontanaMontana Supreme Court · 1928
- Colwell v. Union Central L. Ins. Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1930
- Ebner v. SteffansonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1919
- Sherman v. NixonIdaho Supreme Court · 1922
- Pacific Live Stock Co. v. Ellison Ranching Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1921
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.