Legal Opinion
Youell v. Maddox
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided July 11, 1988No. Civ. A. 86-300-JLLPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
LATCHUM, Senior District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
The present matter stems from a suit brought by John R. Youell (“plaintiff”), on behalf of himself and those Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London, subscribing Railroad Protective Liability Policy No. 3649-1982, against James Maddox (“Maddox”), a citizen of Delaware, and J & M Construction and Demolition (“J & M Construction”). 1 The suit arises from a settlement which plaintiff’s insured, and the original nominal plaintiff, Consolidated Rail Corporation (“Conrail”) entered into with its employee, James F. Tuerk (“Tuerk”), who was…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Tennant v. Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Ellis v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- David B. Lilly Co., Inc. v. FisherDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1992
- Wright v. ICI Americas Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1993
- Commonwealth Title Land Insurance Co. v. FunkSuperior Court of Delaware · 2015
- MirTech, Inc. v. AgroFresh, IncDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2021
- Precision Gear Co. v. Continental Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2013