Legal Opinion

Wright v. ICI Americas Inc.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided January 7, 1993No. Civ. A. 91-520 LONPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LONGOBARDI, Chief Judge.

I. NATURE AND STAGE OF PROCEEDINGS

On September 20, 1991, Plaintiff Faquita Wright brought suit against the Defendant pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. Docket Item (“D.I.”) 1. Plaintiff later filed an Amended Complaint on January 30, 1992, D.I. 8, demanding a jury trial, compensatory and punitive damages and expert fees pursuant to the Civil Rights Act of 1991 which amended Title VII and was enacted into law on November 21, 1991. Public Law 102-166, Nov. 21, 1991, Section 101 et seq.

In Count I of her Amended…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Schuster v. DerociliSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001
  2. Williams v. Chrysler Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1998
  3. Holland v. ZarifCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API