Legal Opinion · Dissent

Precision Gear Co. v. Continental Motors, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 12, 2013No. 1110786Published

1DissentMurdock, Justice

“This appeal presents a classic example of the wilderness in which courts sometimes find themselves when searching for solutions to problems arising under the judicial nightmare known as Conflict of Laws.”

Forsyth v. Cessna Aircraft Co., 520 F.2d 608, 609 (9th Cir.1975).

I agree that we must apply the choice-of-law principles of the forum state, in this case Aabama, in order to decide which state’s substantive law will be applied to the claims at issue. Aabama follows the traditional principles of lex loci contractus and lex loci delicti that may direct us to the law of different states…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Cherry, Bekaert & Holland v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  2. Fitts v. Minnesota Min. & Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  3. Melia v. Zenhire, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
  4. Ronald G. Forsyth v. Cessna Aircraft CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  5. Etheredge v. Genie Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API