Legal Opinion

Temple Trust Co. v. Stobaugh

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 5, 1933No. 7803PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAUGH, Justice.

Suit was by appellee to recover payments of interest alleged to be usurious and over-payments of principal, on two separate loans made by appellant and secured by deeds of trust on real estate in Coleman county, owned by appellee. The loans were for different sums, made on different dates, and matured differently, but the same plans, ratios, and interest rates prevailed in each, and for purposes of clarity and brevity we shall discuss the issue of usury as to the first loan, and as to the second only so far as the issues presented differ from those involved in the first.

The…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Shropshire v. Commerce Farm Credit Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Shropshire v. Commerce Farm Credit Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Cain v. BonnerTexas Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Washer v. SmyerTexas Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Rosetti v. LozanoTexas Supreme Court · 1902

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. L. K. Peterson and William H. Scott, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
  2. Adleson v. B. F. Dittmar Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Temple Trust Co. v. HaneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  4. Wellfare v. Realty Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  5. City of Winters v. BethuneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API