Legal Opinion

Adleson v. B. F. Dittmar Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1935No. 6842PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Judge SMEDLEY

delivered the opinion of the Commission of Appeals.

Plaintiffs in error recovered judgment in district court against defendant in error for $3,852, representing double the amount of payments alleged to have been made as interest pursuant to a usurious contract. The Court of Civil Appeals reversed that judgment and adjudged that plaintiffs in error take nothing. 75 S. W. (2d) 1100.

The contract was evidenced by a promissory note executed by plaintiffs in error, payable to defendant in error, _ for the principal sum of $6,000 in sixty installments of $126 each, including…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Rosetti v. LozanoTexas Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Milliken v. SmootTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  3. International Building & Loan Ass'n v. BieringTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Sugg v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  5. Deming Investment Co. v. GiddensTexas Supreme Court · 1930

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. Lovick v. Ritemoney Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
  2. Nevels v. HarrisTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  3. L. K. Peterson and William H. Scott, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
  4. Tanner Development Co. v. FergusonTexas Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Greever v. PerskyTexas Supreme Court · 1942

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API